Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

Exedy Mach 600 clutch and Billet Flywheel Review (S197 Mustang)


This is a bit overdue (okay, long overdue) but I figured it's better late than never. If you're following me on Instagram or Facebook, you already know that I had to replace my clutch in 2018. It wasn't so much because the clutch failed. It was actually the clutch slave cylinder. Why would I need to replace the clutch if my slave cylinder went? Well, Ford had the genius idea of putting the slave cylinder inside the transmission. Ok, this isn't entirely fair. Putting my engineer hat on, I can see how this makes sense. If you put the slave cylinder in, it's outside of the elements and should theoretically last longer. Unfortunately, Ford should have invested in a better slave cylinder for this to be a great idea, not one that can't make it past 22,500 miles (36,000 kms), albeit with track use - which probably exacerbates the problem because of the additional heat and higher temps. But I digress.

At any rate, the slave cylinder went. Most people would replace the clutch in this case since you have to tear into the trans anyway. I was certainly considering it, but my decision became a lot easier when I got a call from the shop saying that the slave cylinder bent and damaged the clutch pressure plate. I needed a new clutch. After a lot of shopping around to find vendors and figure out which clutch to buy, the awesome folk at Team Beefcake Racing put together a great deal for me for a new Exedy Mach 600 (stage 4) clutch, Exedy billet flywheel (factory one doesn't fit), and a new hydraulic slave cylinder.


The clutch is the highest spec single-disc for this car and is good for 734 lb-ft at the flywheel, so there's massive room to grow and far more than I'd ever have since the car will always stay naturally aspirated. I pulled the trigger. An excruciating 500 break-in miles followed, which required no high rpm shifting, quick shifting, or hard launches according to Exedy. I wasn't sure what constitutes "high rpm", but I considered roughly middle of the range (i.e. 4,000 rpm) to be the threshold for high rpm. That took a great deal of self control, but once that passed, the Boss was finally unleashed again.

My first impression was driving away from the shop and it wasn't too great. There are two issues, both affecting day-to-day driveability. First was with the clutch. Compared to the OEM clutch, the engagement point is lower, the range of modulation is narrower, and clutch take-up is more abrupt. In other words, it's more tricky to take-off or drive in stop-and-go traffic smoothly. I more or less expected that, but I was hoping it would be less pronounced.


The second issue was with the flywheel. It isn't supposed to be a lightweight flywheel, but I'm assuming it is a little lighter. With the OEM clutch and flywheel, you could gently let off the clutch pedal and the car would smoothly takeoff without even giving any gas (I always smoothly rolled in the gas, regardless). With the new flywheel, if you tried to do that, there would be a noticeable shudder followed by vibrations and almost bucking if you didn't start rolling in the power. I also had to keep rpms higher, having to take off above 1,000 rpm or so, otherwise, taking off wasn't smooth or pleasant.

I think the abrupt clutch take up exaggerates the effect of the lighter flywheel and vice versa. But those are issues you'd expect with a higher performance clutch and flywheel. On the plus side, the clutch effort was barely more than stock and clutch feel was great, especially considering the high torque carrying capacity. Overall, I wasn't really disappointed with the clutch. I figured I'd hold my judgement until my first track day. I actually had to go on a couple of drives to accelerate break-in and go 500 miles before the first track day. I arrived on the track after a little over 520 miles following the break-in, so it was close, but I made it. The moment of truth was here and it was finally time to find out how the clutch and flywheel perform where they belong; on track.

2012 Boss 302 at Atlantic Motorsport Park - Andrew R. M. ©

Hole-eeee SMOKES! Ok, a little background first. If you aren't too familiar with pushing a late model Mustang GT or Boss 302, there's a known limitation referred to as "shift lockout". It happens because the clutch is not the best clutch in the world (disengagement is not excellent at high rpms) combined with a remote transmission shifter. The remote shifter in the car is not directly mounted on the transmission, rather, it's mounted to the body/chassis. And because Ford has certain standards for in-car NVH for this car, there are a couple of bushings that have no business being in a car like the Boss 302.

That means that when you're on track and pushing the car, the engine and transmission are moving/deflecting as a result of torque and g-forces but the shifter isn't following in step with every motion. This, combined with the mediocre clutch, result in being locked out of the gear when you are trying a high rpm shift. It's very frustrating and some people have ruined their synchros as a result. I learned to drive around it (delaying the shifts slightly if the car isn't going straight seems to work the vast majority of the time).

2012 Boss 302 at Atlantic Motorsport Park - Kevin Doubleday ©

With the new clutch, though, there's no such need. Shifting can be faster and feels SO much more satisfying. This was most noticeable in the 2 to 3 shift between T2 and T3 on our track, which is uphill, very slightly cambered, and never completely straightens out from exit of T2 to entry of T3. All of this resulted in plenty of missed 2 to 3 shifts if you tried to hurry it, so I stopped. With the new clutch, it was a breathe. I missed it once or twice on the first day immediately following the 500-mile break-in period. In the 13 track days since (including 3 Time Attacks), I've never missed a shift. And the narrow range of modulation works perfectly on track and imparts a feeling that the clutch is much more precise (which it is).

The small downsides are a very small price to pay for a (much) higher performing clutch. It performs flawlessly on track, but is still light and smooth on the street. There is no chatter and once you get used to it, you can easily perfect smooth take-offs. If the car is going to serve double duty for daily driving that you are always run into grid-lock stop-and-go type traffic, you might get annoyed by it. Otherwise, it'll be excellent. Overall, I couldn't be happier with the clutch and would happily recommend it to others.

Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Limited Slip Differentials - The Basics

I'm finishing up a comparison post (link to introduction: Intro: Focus RS vs Golf R vs WRX STI vs Evo X ) and, throughout the post, I realized that I have to go off topic a lot to talk about how each type of differential changes the way the car drives. As a result, I thought I'd write a separate post to go into more detail before I post the comparison to keep it more focused on the cars and avoid veering off topic too much. By saying "Limited Slip Differentials" in the title, I am including torque vectoring diffs because, although current conventional terminology treats them differently, a torque vectoring differential is, in essence, a very sophisticated limited slip diff (LSD) that can be manipulated to actively help the car handle better. And while none of the cars in the comparison use open (without help from the brakes) or non-gear mechanical LSD’s, I’ll briefly discuss them so that the post is more inclusive. I’ll only focus on using power to help the...

Ford Focus RS vs Subaru WRX STI vs Mitsubishi Evo X MR

All these cars have one common Achilles' heel. The engines sit entirely ahead of the front axles; a great family recipe for understeer. Then tell the front tires - already taxed from trying to keep that front engine sitting outside the wheelbase from going straight - to put some power down and you can only make matters worse. There are ways to mitigate the understeer with suspension tuning, of course, but the toughest part is power-on understeer. I don't want to get much into tires, but the thing to remember is that because tires have a certain "grip budget" - how much total grip they can hold/generate before they let go - when you get on the power in a car that sends power to the front wheels (FWD or AWD), you will rob some of the precious grip you were relying on to turn the car in order to put all or some power down. You'll run out of front lateral grip sooner than you would have otherwise, as a result. Worse yet, because of the unideal en...

2015 Mustang GT breaks into the 11's in the 1/4 mile!

It went 11.77 seconds to be exact and past the traps at 116 mph and that's with minor modifications. The modifications were courtesy of the folks at Ford Racing. They recently got a hold of three 2015 Mustangs, one with the 2.3L EcoBoost engine making 310 hp and two GT's with the 5.0L V8 making 435 hp. The power modifications are minor for two of the three Mustangs. The 2.3 EcoBoost gets a "Prototype Off-Road Exhaust" which most likely means there are no catalytic converters or "cats", a more free flowing exhaust and a tune. One of the GT's gets the same off-road exhaust treatment and a tune plus "ARH Cobra Jet Long Tube Headers". In the video, they say they did "a few changes to the air intake system but basically these are close to what any consumer can buy" so they may have included a K&N drop-in filter which FRPP Performance Packs for the 2014 Mustang GT included or an aftermarket CAI with a cone style filter....

2016 Mustang EcoBoost Track Review

Photography by: Graham MacNeil Ford really wants to sell you a Mustang with a turbo four cylinder. They started by derating the V6 engine in the 2015 S550 compared to the 2011-2014 S197 V6 to make the EcoBoost 2.3 litre more differentiated. Then, they offered a performance pack on the EcoBoost but not on the V6. Now, they killed the V6 all together for 2018 and will only sell you a V8 or this EcoBoost. I love a good V8, everyone who knows me knows that. This is a Mustang, which means it needs a V8. If those aren't enough reasons, I always prefer natural aspiration over forced induction. That's three strikes against the EcoBoost-powered Mustang. But I'd be lying if I said the idea never intrigued me. It's the lightest (if you account for features). It has the best weight distribution. It has the same great chassis as the GT. It's very affordable and it has a lot of potential to make more power. Aftermarket? Endless support. There's plenty of good about it....